Niosome: a Novel Drug Delivery System
Kshitij B. Makeshwar*, Suraj R. Wasankar
Department of Pharmaceutics, Vidyabharti College of Pharmacy, Camp Road, Amravati,
Maharashtra 444602.
ABSTRACT:
Niosomes are a novel drug delivery
system, in which the medication is encapsulated in a vesicle. The vesicle is
composed of a bilayer of non-ionic surface active
agents and hence the name niosomes. Structurally, niosomes are similar to liposomes,
in that they are also made up of a bilayer. However,
the bilayer in the case of niosomes
is made up of non-ionic surface active agents rather than phospholipids as seen
in the case of liposomes. Most surface active agents
when immersed in water yield micellar structures
however some surfactants can yield bilayer vesicles
which are niosomes. Niosomes
may be unilamellaror multilamellar
depending on the method used to prepare them. The niosomes
are classified as a function of the number of bilayer
(e.g. MLV, SUV) or as a function of size. (e.g. LUV, SUV) or as a function of
the method of preparation (e.g.REV, DRV). Niosomes present a structure similar to liposome and hence
they can represent alternative vesicular systems with respect to liposomes, due to the niosome
ability to encapsulate different type of drugs within their multienvironmental
structure. The technology utilized in niosomes is
still greatly in its infancy, and already it is showing promise in the fields
of cancer and infectious disease treatments.
KEYWORDS: Unilamellar, Multilamellar,
Niosomes, Phospholipids, Multienvironmental.
1. INTRODUCTION:
Niosomes are a novel drug
delivery system, in which the medication is encapsulated in a vesicle. The
vesicle is composed of a bilayer of non-ionic surface
active agents and hence the name niosomes. The niosomes are very small, and microscopic in size. Their
size lies in the nanometric scale. Although
structurally similar to liposomes, they offer several
advantages over them. Niosomes have recently been
shown to greatly increase transdermal drug delivery
and also can be used in targeted drug delivery, and thus increased study in
these structures can provide new methods for drug delivery.
2] Salient features
of niosomes(16) .
1. Niosomes can entrap solutes in a manner analogous
to liposomes.
2. Niosomes are osmotically active and stable.
3. Niosomes possess
an infra structure consisting of hydrophobic and hydrophilic mostly together
and so also accommodate the drug molecules with a wide range of solubility.
4. Niosomes
exhibits flexibility in their structural characteristics (composition, fluidity
and size) and can be designed according to the desired situation.
5. Niosomes can improve the performance of the drug molecules.
6. Better
availability to the particular site, just by protecting the drug from
biological environment.
7. Niosomes surfactants are biodegradable,
biocompatible and non-immunogenic.
3] Structure of
Niosomes(2-4).
Structurally, niosomes are
similar to liposomes, in that they are also made up
of a bilayer. However, the bilayer
in the case of niosomes is made up of non-ionic
surface active agents rather than phospholipids as seen in the case of liposomes. Most surface active agents when immersed in
water yield micellar structures however some
surfactants can yield bilayer vesicles which are niosomes. Niosomes may be unilamellaror multilamellar
depending on the method used to prepare them.The niosome is made of a surfactant bilayer
with its hydrophilic ends exposed on the outside and inside of the vesicle,
while the hydrophobic chains face each other within the bilayer.
Hence, the vesicle holds hydrophilic drugs within the space enclosed in the
vesicle, while hydrophobic drugs are embedded within the bilayer
itself. The figure below will give a better idea of what a niosome
looks like and where the drug is located within the vesicle. Shown in figure 1.
Figure 1: Structure
of Niosomes
A typical niosome vesicle
would consist of a vesicle forming ampiphile i.e. a
non-ionic surfactant such as Span-60, which is usually stabilized by the
addition of cholesterol and a small amount of non ionic surfactant such as diacetyl phosphate, which also helps in stabilizing the
vesicle.
4] Advantages of niosomes(5).
A. The vesicle suspension is water- based
vehicle. This offers high patient compliance in comparison with oily dosage
forms.
B. They possess an infrastructure consisting
of hydrophilic, amphiphilic and lipophilic
moieties together and as a result can accommodate drug molecules with a wide
range of solubilities.
C. The characteristics of the vesicle
formulation are variable and controllable. Altering vesicle composition, size, lamellarity, tapped volume, surface charge and
concentration can control the vesicle characteristics.
D. The vesicles may act as a depot, releasing
the drug in a controlled manner.
E. They can reduce drug toxicity because of
their non-ionic nature.
5]Types of niosomes(5).
The niosomes are classified
as a function of the number of bilayer (e.g. MLV,
SUV) or as a function of size. (e.g. LUV, SUV) or as a function of the method
of preparation (e.g.REV, DRV). The various types of niosomes are described below:
i) Multi
lamellar vesicles (MLV),
ii) Large unilamellar
vesicles (LUV),
iii) Small unilamellar
vesicles (SUV).
1. Multilamellar vesicles (mlv):
It consists of a number of bilayer
surrounding the aqueous lipid compartment separately. The approximate size of
these vesicles is 0.5-10 μm diameter. Multilamellar
vesicles are the most widely used niosomes.
It is simple to make and are mechanically stable upon storage for long periods.
These vesicles are highly suited as drug carrier for lipophilic
compounds.
2. Large unilamellar
vesicles (luv):
Niosomes of this type have
a high aqueous/lipid compartment ratio, so that larger volumes of
bio-active materials can be entrapped with a very economical use of membrane
lipids.
3. Small unilamellar
vesicles (suv):
These small unilamellar
vesicles are mostly prepared from multilamellar
vesicles by sonication method, French press extrusion electrostatic
stabilization is the inclusion of dicetyl phosphate
in 5(6)-carboxyfluorescein (CF) loaded Span 60 based niosomes.
6] Method
of preparation of niosomes(6).
Niosomes can be prepared by
a number of methods which are as follows:
Ether Injection Method
In this method, a solution of the surfactant is made
by dissolving it in diethyl ether. This solution is then introduced using an
injection (14 gauge needle) into warm water or aqueous media containing the
drug maintained at 60°C. Vaporization of the ether leads to the formation of
single layered vesicles. The particle size of the niosomes
formed depend on the conditions used, and can range anywhere between 50-1000 μm.
Hand Shaking Method (Thin Film Hydration Technique)
In this method a mixture of the vesicle forming agents
such as the surfactant and cholesterol are dissolved in a volatile organic
solvent such as diethyl ether or chloroform in a round bottom flask. The
organic solvent is removed at room temperature using a rotary evaporator, which
leaves a thin film of solid mixture deposited on the walls of the flask. This
dried surfactant film can then be rehydrated with the aqueous phase, with
gentle agitation to yield multilamellar niosomes.
Reverse Phase Evaporation Technique (REV)
This method involves the creation of a solution of
cholesterol and surfactant (1:1 ratio) in a mixture of ether and chloroform. An
aqueous phase containing the drug to be loaded is added to this, and the
resulting two phases are sonicated at 4-5°C. A clear
gel is formed which is further sonicated after the
addition of phosphate buffered saline (PBS). After this the temperature is
raised to 40°C and pressure is reduced to remove the organic phase. This
results in a viscous niosome suspension which can be
diluted with PBS and heated on a water bath at 60°C for 10 mins
to yield niosomes.
Transmembrane pH
gradient Drug Uptake Process (Remote Loading)
In this method, a solution of surfactant and
cholesterol is made in chloroform. The solvent is then evaporated under reduced
pressure to get a thin film on the wall of the round bottom flask, similar to
the hand shaking method. This film is then hydrated using citric acid solution
by vortex mixing. The resulting multilamellar
vesicles are then treated to three freeze thaw cycles and sonicated.
To the niosomal suspension, aqueous solution
containing 10mg/ml of drug is added and vortexed. The
pH of the sample is then raised to 7.0-7.2 using 1M disodium phosphate and
mixture is later heated at 60°C for 10 minutes to give niosomes.
The “Bubble” Method
It is a technique which has only recently been
developed and which allows the preparation of niosomes
without the use of organic solvents. The bubbling unit consists of a round
bottom flask with three necks, and this is positioned in a water bath to
control the temperature. Water-cooled reflux and thermometer is positioned in
the first and second neck, while the third neck is used to supply nitrogen.
Cholesterol and surfactant are dispersed together in a buffer (pH 7.4) at 70°C.
This dispersion is mixed for a period of 15 seconds with high shear homogenizer
and immediately afterwards, it is bubbled at 70°C using the nitrogen gas to
yield niosomes.
Micro Fluidization
Micro fluidization is a recent technique used to
prepare unilamellar vesicles of defined size
distribution. This method is based on submerged jet principle in which two
fluidized streams interact at ultra high velocities, in precisely defined micro
channels within the interaction chamber. The impingement of thin liquid sheet
along a common front is arranged such that the energy supplied to the system
remains within the area of niosomes formation. The
result is a greater uniformity, smaller size and better reproducibility of
noisome are formed.
Multiple Membrane Extrusion Method
Mixture of surfactant, cholesterol and dicetyl phosphate in chloroform is made into thin film by
evaporation. The film is hydrated with aqueous drug polycarbonate membranes
solution and the resultant suspension extruded through which are placed in series
for up to 8 passages. It is a good method for controlling niosome
size.
Sonication
A typical method of production of the vesicles is by
sonication of solution. In this method an aliquot of drug solution in buffer is
added to the surfactant/cholesterol mixture in a 10 ml glass vial. The mixture
is probe sonicated at 60°C for 3 minutes using a sonicator with a titanium probe to yield niosomes.
7]
Formation of Niosomes from Proniosomes:
Another method of producing niosomes
is to coat a water-soluble carrier such as sorbitol
with surfactant. The result of the coating process is a dry formulation. In
which each water-soluble particle is covered with a thin film of dry
surfactant. This preparation is termed “Proniosomes”.
The niosomes are recognized by the addition of
aqueous phase at T > Tm and brief agitation. shown in figure 2.
T=Temperature.
Tm = mean phase transition temperature.
Figure 2 : Formulation of Niosomes from Proniosome
8] Separation of Unentrapped
Drug(7-9).
The removal of unentrapped
solute from the vesicles can be accomplished by various techniques, which
include: -
1) Dialysis:
The aqueous niosomal
dispersion is dialyzed in a dialysis tubing against phosphate buffer or normal
saline or glucose solution.
2) Gel Filtration:
The unentrapped drug is
removed by gel filtration of niosomal dispersion
through a Sephadex-G -50 column and elution with
phosphate buffered saline or normal saline.
3) Centrifugation:
The niosomal suspension is
centrifuged and the supernatant is separated. The pellet is washed and then resuspended to obtain a niosomal
suspension free from unentrapped drug.
9] Characterization of niosomes(10,17).
1. Size, Shape and Morphology
Structure of surfactant based vesicles has been
visualized and established using freeze fracture microscopy while photon
correlation spectroscopy used to determine mean diameter of the vesicles.
Electron microscopy used for morphological studies of vesicles while laser beam
is generally used to determine size distribution, mean surface diameter and
mass distribution of niosomes.
2. Entrapment efficiency
After preparing niosomal
dispersion, unentrapped drug is separated by
dialysis, centrifugation, or gel filtration as described above and the drug
remained entrapped in niosomes is determined by complete
vesicle disruption using 50% n-propanol or 0.1%
Triton X-100 and analysing the resultant solution by appropriate assay method
for the drug. Where, % Entrapment efficiency (% EF) = (Amount of drug
entrapped/ total amount of drug) x 100
3. Vesicle diameter
Niosomes diameter can be
determined using light microscopy, photon correlation microscopy and freeze
fracture electron microscopy. Freeze thawing (keeping vesicles suspension at
20°C for 24 hrs and then heating to ambient temperature) of niosomes
increases the vesicle diameter, which might be attributed to fusion of vesicles
during the cycle.
4. In-vitro release
A method of in-vitro release rate study includes the
use of dialysis tubing. A dialysis sac is washed and soaked in distilled water.
The vesicle suspension is pipetted into a bag made up
of the tubing and sealed. The bag containing the vesicles is placed in 200 ml
of buffer solution in a 250 ml beaker with constant shaking at 25°C or 37°C. At
various time intervals, the buffer is analyzed for the drug content by an
appropriate assay method.
5. Vesicle charge
The vesicle surface charge can play an important role
in the behavior of niosomes
in vivo and in vivo. In general, charged niosomes are
more stable against aggregation and fusion than uncharged vesicles. In order to
obtain an estimate of the surface potential, the zeta potential of individual niosomes can be measured by microelectrophoresis.
An alternative approach is the use of pH sensitive fluorophores.
More recently, dynamic light scattering have been used to measure the zeta
potential of niosomes.
6. Bilayer Rigidity and
Homogeneity
The biodistribution and
biodegradation of niosomes are influenced by rigidity
of the bilayer. In omogeneity
can occur both within niosome structures themselves
and between niosomes in dispersion and could be
identified via. NMR, differential scanning calorimetry
(DSC) and fourier transform-infra red spectroscopy
(FT-IR) techniques. Recently, fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) was
used to obtain deeper insight about the shape, size and structure of the niosomes.
7. Niosomal drug loading and
encapsulation efficiency
To determine drug loading and encapsulation
efficiency, the niosomal aqueous suspension was ultracentrifuged, supernatant was removed and sediment was
washed twice with distilled water in order to remove the adsorbed drug.
The niosomal recovery was
calculated as:
Amount of niosomes recovered
Niosome recovery (%)= -----------------------------------------------X 100
Amount of polymer
+ Drug + Excipient
The
entrapment efficiency (EE) was then calculated using formula:
Amount
of drug in niosomes
Entrapment efficiency (%)= --------------------------------------------X
100
Amount of Drug used
The drug
loading was calculated as:
Amount of drug
in niosomes
Drug loading (%)= -----------------------------------------------X
100
Amount of niosomes recovered
10] Niosomal drug release
Recently, FRET was used to monitor release of
encapsulated matters in niosomes by using separate niosomal suspensions incorporating donor and acceptor. The
simplest method to determine in vitro release kinetics of the loaded drug is by
incubating a known quantity of drug loaded niosomes
in a buffer of suitable pH at 370C with continuous stirring,
withdrawing samples periodically and analyzed the amount of drug by suitable
analytical technique. Dialysis bags or dialysis membranes are commonly used to
minimize interference.
11] Applications
of niosomes(11-15).
The application of niosomal
technology is widely varied and can be used to treat a number of diseases.
Niosomes as Drug
Carriers
Niosomes have also been
used as carriers for iobitridol, a diagnostic agent
used for Xray imaging. Topical niosomes
may serve as solubilization matrix, as a local depot
for sustained release of dermally active compounds,
as penetration enhancers, or as rate-limiting membrane barrier for the
modulation of systemic absorption of drugs.
Drug Targetting
One of the most useful aspects of niosomes
is their ability to target drugs. Niosomes can be
used to target drugs to the reticuloendothelial
system. The reticulo-endothelial system (RES)
preferentially takes up niosome vesicles. The uptake
of niosomes is controlled by circulating serum
factors called opsonins. These opsonins
mark the niosome for clearance. Such localization of
drugs is utilized to treat tumors in animals known to
metastasize to the liver and spleen. This localization of drugs can also be
used for treating parasitic infections of the liver. Niosomes
can also be utilized for targeting drugs to organs other than the RES. A
carrier system (such as antibodies) can be attached to niosomes
(as immunoglobulin’s bind readily to the lipid surface of the niosome) to target them to specific organs.
Anti-neoplastic Treatment
Most antineoplastic drugs
cause severe side effects. Niosomes can alter the
metabolism; prolong circulation and half life of the drug, thus decreasing the
side effects of the drugs. Niosomes, is decreased
rate of proliferation of tumor and higher plasma
levels accompanied by slower elimination.
Leishmaniasis
Leishmaniasis is a
disease in which a parasite of the genus Leishmania
invades the cells of the liver and spleen. Use of niosomes
in tests conducted showed that it was possible to administer higher levels of
the drug without the triggering of the side effects, and thus allowed greater
efficacy in treatment.
Delivery of Peptide Drugs
Oral peptide drug delivery has long been faced with a
challenge of bypassing the enzymes which would breakdown the peptide. Use of niosomes to successfully protect the peptides from
gastrointestinal peptide breakdown is being investigated. In an in vitro study
conducted by oral delivery of a vasopressin derivative entrapped in niosomes showed that entrapment of the drug significantly
increased the stability of the peptide.
Use in Studying Immune Response
Due to their immunological selectivity, low toxicity
and greater stability; niosomes are being used to
study the nature of the immune response provoked by antigens. Non-ionic
surfactant vesicles have clearly demonstrated their ability to function as adjuvant
following parenteral administration with a number of different antigens and
peptides.
Niosomes as
Carriers for Haemoglobin
Niosomes can be used as
carriers for haemoglobin within the blood. The niosomal
vesicle is permeable to oxygen and hence can act as a carrier for haemoglobin
in anaemic patients.
Other Applications(13-15).
a) Sustained Release
Sustained release action of niosomes
can be applied to drugs with low therapeutic index and low water solubility
since those could be maintained in the circulation via niosomal
encapsulation.
b) Localized Drug Action
Drug delivery through niosomes
is one of the approaches to achieve localized drug action, since their size and
low penetrability through epithelium and connective tissue keeps the drug
localized at the site of administration.
12]
Conclusion:
Niosomes present a
structure similar to liposome and hence they can represent alternative
vesicular systems with respect to liposomes, due to
the niosome ability to encapsulate different type of
drugs within their multienvironmental structure. The
technology utilized in niosomes is still greatly in
its infancy, and already it is showing promise in the fields of cancer and
infectious disease treatments. The system is already in use for various
cosmetic products. Niosomes represent a promising
drug delivery technology various type of drug deliveries can be possible using niosomes like targeting, ophthalmic, topical, parenteral, etc.
13] References:
1. Baillie
AJ, Florence AT, Hume IR, Murihead GT, Rogerson A, The preparation and properties of niosomes-Nonionic surfactant vesicles,.J.
Pharm. Pharmacol, 37, 2003, pp. 863-868.
2. Chandraprakash KS, Udupa N, Umadevi P and Pillai GK, Indian
J. Pharm. Sci., 54, 1992, pp. 197.
3. www.pharmainfo.net/reviews/niosome-unique-drug
delivery system
4. Duijad RC, Manvi FC, Swati S and Rony M, Indian Drugs,
2008, pp. 713.
5. Gadhiya P, Shukla S, Modi D, Bharadia
P, A Review- Niosomes in Targeted Drug Delivery, International Journal for Pharmaceutical
Research Scholars, 2, 2012, pp. 61.
6. Pawar SD, Pawar RG, Kodag
PP, Waghmare AS, Niosome:
An Unique Drug Delivery System, International Journal of Biology, Pharmacy and
Allied Sciences,3, 2012, pp 409-412.
7. Khandare JN,
Madhavi G, Tamhankar
BM, Niosomes novel drug delivery system. The East
Pharmacist. 37, 1994, pp. 61-64.
8. Maver LD, Bally MB, Hope MJ, Cullis
PR, Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 816, 1985, pp. 294-302.
9. Blazek-Walsh
AI, Rhodes DG, SEM imaging predicts quality of niosomes
from maltodextrin-based proniosomes,
Pharm. Res. 18, 2001, pp. 656-661
10. Gadhiya P, Shukla S, Modi D, Bharadia
P, A Review- Niosomes in Targeted Drug Delivery, International Journal for Pharmaceutical
Research Scholars, 2, 2012.
11. Akul Mehta, PharmaXChange_info -
Articles – Niosomes
12. Ruckmani K, Jayakar B
and Ghosal SK, Drug Development and Industrial
Pharmacy, 26, 2000, pp. 217-222.
13. Baillie
AJ, Coombs GH and Dolan TF, Non-ionic surfactant vesicles, niosomes,
as delivery system for the anti-leishmanial drug,
sodium stribogluconate, J. Pharm. Pharmacol.,
38, 1986, pp. 502-505
14. Conacher M, Alexanderand
J, Brewer JM, Conacher M, and Alexander J, Niosomes as Immunological Adjuvants.
In “Synthetic Surfactant Vesicles” (Ed. I.F. Uchegbu)
International Publishers Distributors Ltd. Singapore, 2000, pp. 185-205.
15. Azmin MN, Florence AT, Handjani-Vila
RM, Stuart JB, Vanlerberghe, G and Whittaker JS, J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 37, 1985, pp, 237.
16. Gadhiya P, Shukla S, Modi D, Bharadia
P, A Review- Niosomes in Targeted Drug Delivery, International Journal for Pharmaceutical
Research Scholars, 2, 2012, pp. 60.
17. Pawar SD, Pawar RG, Kodag
PP, Waghmare AS, Niosome:
An Unique Drug Delivery System, International Journal of Biology, Pharmacy and
Allied Sciences,3, 2012, pp. 412.
Received on 16.12.2012 Accepted on 30.01.2013
© Asian Pharma
Press All Right Reserved
Asian
J. Pharm. Res. 3(1): Jan.-Mar. 2013; Page 15-19